Netflix vs Disney comparison

How does NFLX compare to DIS?

{"response_type": "market_analysis", "acknowledgement": "Here's a comparison of NFLX and DIS over the past year.", "answer": "**Performance Over the Past Year:**\n- **NFLX** experienced a total return of -37.38%, with an annualized decline of -33.69%. Its end-of-period price is $73.33, down from $117.10; it also saw a maximum drawdown of -46.49%.\n- **DIS** saw a smaller decline with a total return of -16.58%, or an annualized -13.93%, ending at $98.14 from an initial $117.65. Its maximum drawdown was -22.04%.\n\n**Volatility:**\n- NFLX's daily volatility is higher at 2.20% (annualized 34.94%), indicating greater short-term price swings.\n- DIS's daily volatility is lower at 1.61% (annualized 25.58%), reflecting somewhat steadier price movements.\n\n**Drawdowns:**\n- NFLX's maximum drawdown of -46.49% occurred on July 20, 2026, over the past year, indicating high downside risk.\n- DIS's maximum drawdown of -22.04% occurred on March 27, 2026, over the past year, suggesting better downside protection.\n\n**Summary:** NFLX underperformed relative to DIS over the past year, with greater volatility and a deeper maximum drawdown, indicating higher risk and more pronounced decline in investor value. DIS's relatively milder decline and lower volatility suggest it was somewhat more stable during this period.\n\n**Actions:**\n- Consider reviewing recent earnings and future outlooks for both companies.\n- Analyze sector trends impacting entertainment and streaming/media stocks.\n- Evaluate how macro factors like interest rates or consumer spending are influencing media stocks.\n", "interpretation": "NFLX's substantial decline and higher volatility over the past year suggest a challenging environment, possibly due to sector-specific headwinds or company-specific factors. DIS's comparatively milder decline and lower volatility indicate it may have been more resilient during this period. Investors should examine upcoming earnings reports and sector dynamics to assess future risks and opportunities.", "hypothesis": {"text": "NFLX's larger decline may be associated with sector pressures such as increased competition and content costs, while DIS's smaller drop reflects its diversification within the entertainment industry.", "confidence": "Moderate"}, "insights": ["NFLX's maximum drawdown of -46.49% indicates significant downside risk over the past year.", "DIS's smaller drawdown of -22.04% suggests better defensive positioning amid sector turbulence."], "suggested_questions": ["Compare NFLX and DIS earnings trends", "Check sector performance for media stocks", "Analyze upcoming earnings for NFLX and DIS"], "charts": [{"type": "bar", "title": "Performance Comparison (1Y)", "data": [{"label": "NFLX", "value": -37.38}, {"label": "DIS", "value": -16.58}]}], "actions": [], "supporting_data": [], "risk_watch": "", "structured_data": null}

Compare NFLX and DIS earnings trends

{"response_type": "market_analysis", "acknowledgement": "I've compared the latest earnings trends of NFLX and DIS.", "answer": "**Earnings and Financial Metrics Comparison:**\n- **Revenue:**\n - NFLX reported roughly $48.37 billion.\n - DIS generated significantly higher revenue at around $97.26 billion.\n\n- **Net Income:**\n - NFLX's net income stands at approximately $13.65 billion.\n - DIS reported net income around $11.22 billion, slightly lower than NFLX.\n\n- **EPS:**\n - NFLX has an EPS of $3.18.\n - DIS has a higher EPS at $6.38.\n\n- **Valuation Ratios:**\n - NFLX trades at a P/E ratio of 23.06 with a forward P/E of 19.21.\n - DIS trades at a lower P/E of 15.38 with a forward P/E of 13.16, indicating a potentially more attractive valuation.\n\n- **Other Metrics:**\n - NFLX has a higher price-to-book ratio at 10.13 compared to DIS's 1.58, reflecting higher growth expectations or more expensive stock relative to equity.\n - DIS offers a dividend yield of 1.56%, while NFLX does not pay dividends.\n - Betas are comparable (NFLX at 1.51, DIS at 1.40), indicating similar market risk sensitivity.\n\n**Summary:** DIS leads in revenue scale and shows higher EPS with a more conservative valuation multiple and dividend income. NFLX, while having a smaller revenue base, generates higher net income and trades at higher valuation multiples, reflecting its growth orientation despite recent price pressure.\n", "interpretation": "The earnings data suggests DIS operates on a larger scale with more diversified revenue and a stronger earnings per share figure, accompanied by income return via dividends. NFLX's valuations imply market expectations for growth, though with higher risk given the recent share price declines. For investor consideration, evaluating forward growth outlook and margin trends next would clarify sustainability of these fundamentals.", "hypothesis": {"text": "NFLX's higher valuation multiples amid recent price declines may suggest investor uncertainty about growth sustainability versus DIS's steadier fundamentals.", "confidence": "Moderate"}, "insights": ["DIS has almost double NFLX's revenue, indicating larger scale operations.", "NFLX generates higher net income despite lower revenue, suggesting higher profitability or margin efficiency."], "suggested_questions": ["Compare NFLX vs DIS forward estimates", "Analyze NFLX and DIS margin trends", "Review DIS dividend history and stability"], "charts": [{"type": "bar", "title": "Earnings Metrics Comparison (Latest)", "data": [{"label": "Revenue - NFLX ($B)", "value": 48.37}, {"label": "Revenue - DIS ($B)", "value": 97.26}, {"label": "Net Income - NFLX ($B)", "value": 13.65}, {"label": "Net Income - DIS ($B)", "value": 11.22}, {"label": "EPS - NFLX", "value": 3.18}, {"label": "EPS - DIS", "value": 6.38}, {"label": "P/E Ratio - NFLX", "value": 23.06}, {"label": "P/E Ratio - DIS", "value": 15.38}]}], "actions": [{"label": "Compare NFLX vs DIS forward estimates", "action_type": "compare_stocks", "parameters": {"tickers": ["NFLX", "DIS"]}}, {"label": "Analyze NFLX and DIS margin trends", "action_type": "compare_stocks", "parameters": {"tickers": ["NFLX", "DIS"]}}], "supporting_data": [], "risk_watch": "", "structured_data": {"template": "stock_analysis", "stocks": [{"ticker": "NFLX", "name": "Netflix, Inc.", "sector": "Communication Services", "market_cap": 305341693952, "pe_trailing": 23.059748, "pe_forward": 19.208605, "pb_ratio": 10.127054, "dividend_yield": null, "beta": 1.514, "fifty_two_week_high": 126.71, "fifty_two_week_low": 65.08}, {"ticker": "DIS", "name": "Walt Disney Company (The)", "sector": "Communication Services", "market_cap": null, "pe_trailing": 15.382444, "pe_forward": 13.159818, "pb_ratio": 1.5753567, "dividend_yield": 1.56, "beta": 1.395, "fifty_two_week_high": 119.78, "fifty_two_week_low": 92.19}]}}

Compare NFLX vs DIS forward estimates

{"response_type": "market_analysis", "acknowledgement": "Here's a comparison of the forward estimates for NFLX and DIS.", "answer": "**Forward Valuation and Earnings Estimates:**\n- **Forward P/E Ratios:**\n - NFLX trades at a forward P/E of 19.21.\n - DIS trades at a lower forward P/E of 13.16, implying a cheaper valuation relative to expected earnings.\n\n- **EV/EBITDA Ratios:**\n - NFLX's EV/EBITDA stands at 21.25.\n - DIS's EV/EBITDA is lower at 11.09.\n\n- **Growth and Profitability Outlook:**\n - NFLX generally carries a growth profile with higher multiples.\n - DIS has a more value-oriented profile with a dividend yield of 1.56% and lower multiples.\n\n**Summary:** Market expectations price NFLX for sustaining higher growth, reflected in its elevated forward multiples, while DIS appears more moderately valued with income potential through dividends. The large gap in EV/EBITDA also underscores the market\u2019s differing views on capital efficiency and earnings quality between the two companies.", "interpretation": "Forward estimates highlight a contrast in market sentiment and business models: NFLX is viewed as a higher growth but potentially riskier stock with premium valuation, while DIS is seen as more stable and reasonably priced with dividend income. Investors should consider upcoming earnings and guidance to assess whether NFLX can meet growth expectations and whether DIS can leverage its scale effectively.", "hypothesis": {"text": "NFLX's elevated forward multiples relative to DIS suggest higher market confidence in growth prospects despite recent price weakness.", "confidence": "Moderate"}, "insights": ["DIS's forward P/E and EV/EBITDA ratios are roughly 30%-50% lower than NFLX's.", "NFLX's lack of dividend reflects reinvestment into growth initiatives compared to DIS's income strategy."], "suggested_questions": ["Analyze NFLX upcoming earnings guidance", "Check DIS dividend sustainability", "Compare NFLX and DIS margin trends"], "charts": [{"type": "bar", "title": "Forward Valuation Metrics Comparison", "data": [{"label": "Forward P/E - NFLX", "value": 19.21}, {"label": "Forward P/E - DIS", "value": 13.16}, {"label": "EV/EBITDA - NFLX", "value": 21.25}, {"label": "EV/EBITDA - DIS", "value": 11.09}]}], "actions": [{"label": "Analyze NFLX upcoming earnings guidance", "action_type": "search_earnings_guidance", "parameters": {"ticker": "NFLX"}}, {"label": "Check DIS dividend sustainability", "action_type": "web_search", "parameters": {"query": "DIS dividend sustainability 2026"}}], "supporting_data": [], "risk_watch": "", "structured_data": {"template": "stock_comparison", "stocks": {"NFLX": {"name": "Netflix, Inc.", "sector": "Communication Services", "market_cap": 305341693952, "revenue": 48370765824, "net_income": 13649642496, "pe_trailing": 23.059748, "pe_forward": 19.208605, "pb_ratio": 10.127054, "ps_ratio": 6.3125257, "ev_to_ebitda": 21.245, "dividend_yield": null, "beta": 1.514}, "DIS": {"name": "Walt Disney Company (The)", "sector": "Communication Services", "market_cap": null, "revenue": 97263001600, "net_income": 11224000512, "pe_trailing": 15.382444, "pe_forward": 13.159818, "pb_ratio": 1.5753567, "ps_ratio": null, "ev_to_ebitda": 11.09, "dividend_yield": 1.56, "beta": 1.395}}, "returns": {}}}